legal fallacies

In certain circumstances, the context is used to refer to the use of an individual's claims toward him, according to varying views. The primary act of this step is to reach a decision on a certain topic rather than finding the best piece of evidence from a certain source. In the long run, the decision will spark an interpretation that the publics who support those sentiments are incorrect. Woods (105) also argues that while ad hominem is built on mistaken assumptions, it can be used to provide a complete expression. The terminology refers to the practice of using a particular statement as true since it hasn’t been proven otherwise or the use of a given wording as false due to the lack of another interpretation. However, publics have devised new ways of debating in benefit of meeting the inherent conversational hypothesizes. According to Walton (12), the application of the fallacy is based on points of ambition other than a context of relevance. Nevertheless, people are making research particular concepts before they provide a definitive statement to the public.

Fallacies often have a direct link to a person way of living as they originate perceptions from the publications provided in public. My ethic statement has a link to these fallacies as some actions are implemented in life with limited interventions from research. These inconsistencies force me to apply certain activities before conducting extensive research from other sources. In the long run, the ideal truth is only attained after making consultations on the meaning of such statements that are being made against our lives or in response to the job opportunities attained.

Works Cited

Walton, Douglas. Arguments from Ignorance. Penn State: Penn State Press, 2010. Ebook.

Woods, John. The death of argument: fallacies in agent-based reasoning. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2013. Online.